The more you play poker the more money you will make on the long run, but only if you master the game and have the abilities required to stay profitable. The same applies to multi-tabling, because although some players make a lot of money by increasing the number of tables they play at, others suffer catastrophic losses. There is a serious danger in playing multitable poker if you don’t know what you’re up against, so before taking a leap of faith and risk bleeding chips, make sure you are well prepared.
http://www.cardschat.com/multitable-poker.php presents the issue of multi-tabling in a manner that some players might find intimidating, but they are not wrong in their assumptions. What many players tends to overlook is the fact that playing at several tables at once is a challenging thing and not everyone is cut for it. The problem with poker players is that they tend to rise to their level of incompetence and few accept the fact that they might have exceeded their abilities. The only way to prevent it is by adding one table at the time and play in this format for several days in a row.
It is not sufficient to play a few hundred hands at two or three tables than move on to four and so on, because you only catch a glimpse at the big picture. Some players enter autopilot and instead of thinking each hand individually and apply the best strategies, act as robots. On the long run and especially at high stakes, your opponents will sense weakness and make plays against you. If you are overwhelmed by the number of tables that you can’t manage properly, you will be unable to react properly to their aggression and struggle to find explanations for losing many hands in a row.
The Pure bluff is just like the name suggests any bet or raise that is based on nothing more than your gut feeling that the opponent will fold his hand. Basically, regardless of what cards might come on the subsequent streets, your hand can’t possibly improve at least not to the point as to actually win the pot in the event of a showdown. The same applies to those bets or raises made on the river, when you are clearly beaten and the only hope is for your opponent to feel intimidated by your move.
The question is whether this type of bluffs are advisable or if players should refrain from doing them and focused mostly on semi-bluffs. For comparison, the latter are those moves where the player has the worse hand but his cards are promising and in the right circumstances can empower him to win the flop at the showdown. The rule of the thumb is that pure bluffs should be avoided or at least drastically reduced to those circumstances when you have solid reasons to expect a fold from your opponent.
It is generally a mistake to make a pure bluff when there is more than an opponent left in the hand, especially on the late streets. The reason is that in these cases, players are more likely to go all in or at least call an additional amount just to see how strong their hand is. The more players you compete against, the higher the chances for one of them to test your cards strength and this is the worst case scenario for those who make a pure bluff. They work against tight passive opponents, and are especially effective when your table image is one of a tight aggressive player.
The number of hands that are decided on the river should be limited to a select few, and position is one of the decisive factors. Most players choose to disregard position when they feel that their hands have showdown value, or they assume that the opponents are more vulnerable on the final street. In theory, those players who have the ability of taking advantage of their superior metagame can afford to occasionally ignore position. The vast majority of Texas hold ’em players are advised to take it seriously and whenever they have the opportunity, check raise the river with initiative.
It is a move that increases the chance of winning the hand, because in addition to actually taking down the pot with a better hand, it also gives them fold equity. A similar move on the turn can be just as effective, although in this case you take additional chances due to the fact that the board has to reveal an additional card. Tight aggressive players who make continuation bets from early position, are also limited in their decision because a check raise move on the turn can easily backfire. Their opponents are more likely to simply check from behind which strips them of the opportunity to raise.
When done properly, the check raise on the river also protects players from value bets, especially when their opponents identify patterns in their gameplay. While this particular action can be very efficient, it shouldn’t be abused because it can prevent players from extracting maximum value from their strong hands. The risk of an opponent drawing a better hand is nonexistent, since no more cards will be dealt, but not winning the maximum amount is the same as losing money on the long run.
Texas hold ’em players are getting better and better each day, with the Internet playing a significant role in their staggering progress. This means that strategies that used to work like a charm a couple of years ago are now less effective, and this includes the immensely popular continuation bet. Unless you play against inexperienced opponents, the odds of scaring them off with a bet on the flop following a raise pre-flop are slim. Those who play at higher stakes are advised to diversify their strategy and one way of catching the opponents off guard is by using the check behind strategy.
It is particularly useful when you play against a tight opponent, and you’re regarded as a loose aggressive player. Knowing your table image and exploiting it is vital for efficiently using the check behind strategy, without risking it to backfire. After firing a shot pre-flop with a raise from late position, you don’t have to follow up with a continuation bet if the board is dry. Since your opponent is counting on such a move, you should surprise him and check behind to make him wonder whether you hold a monster hand or not.
On the turn, you have two options and each of them has excellent fold equity immediately or on the river. If the opponent checks again, he is practically accepting the fact that his hand is weak and shows his fear, which means that you can safely make a bet. In most cases this will trigger an immediate surrender of the hand, so you can win with a bluff without risking much. The other scenario is that in which your opponent tries to take down the pot by betting, but by calling or raising you showcase a position of strength. Either way, the check behind strategy gives you the chance of winning with the worse hand.